Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Evan | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 2 | PARKE Nathaniel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | ENG Kyler | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 48% | |
| 3 | FU Nolan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 5 | XUE Michael | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 6 | WANG Lucas | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 7 | WHITE Ryden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 40% | 31% |
| 8 | KIM Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | MOSLEY Wally | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 10 | WU Nathan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 10 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 12 | RONG Marcus | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 17% | |
| 13 | HWANG Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 14 | LEE Lucas | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 15 | FU Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 5% |
| 16 | LIN Bryan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 17 | LIU Yihong | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 1% | |
| 18 | LIU Aiden | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 19 | WONG Kyle | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | PARK Sean | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | ZENG Oliver | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | PARRA Lucas | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | SHOURIE Neel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 3% |
| 25 | YOO Lucas | - | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LI Stephen | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | ZHANG Jenson | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 28 | ZHANG Zhihan | 2% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | LAU Caleb | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | MAQUILING Rorey | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% | |
| 31 | GUO Jonathan | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | SHOURIE Seth | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
| 33 | CHEN Aiden | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | ONG David | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 35 | MA kevin | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIU William | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | YI Alexander | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 38 | SI Alexander | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SHIH Derek | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 40 | YUN Mason | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | YANG Rony | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE Connor | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | TENG Eric | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | YUN Nicholas | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | LI Ethan | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | WANG Ryan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | YOON Ian | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LI Connor | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | KONG William | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | TIAN Dylan | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 52 | HUNG Ludwig | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | TAN Yichen | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | FEKETE Jack Fekete | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 55 | CHU Clayton | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 56 | HAILU Noah | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 57 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | ZHAO Luke | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 59 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | THOMPSON Luca | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 61 | WON Jacob | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | MA Murphy | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 63 | WANG Sean | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 64 | GONG Rongtao | 1% | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | LU Jayden | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | LEE Daniel | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | LIU Zeyar | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | MCEWEN Max | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 69 | LEE Cooper | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | LAU Jesse | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | LEE Zeo | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | KOU Logan | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.