Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | ||
3 | ROSE-JONES Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
3 | NUTOVYCH David | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
5 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
6 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 2% |
7 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
8 | SACCOMANNO Shelby | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - |
9 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
10 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | < 1% |
11 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
12 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
13 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
14 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% | 3% | ||
15 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 1% |
16 | FENG Du | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
18 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
19 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
20 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
21 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | - | |
22 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
23 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
24 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
25 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 37% | 6% | < 1% | - | - | |
26 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 1% |
27 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 94% | 53% | 12% | - | ||
28 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
29 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 98% | 76% | 29% | 2% | ||
30 | MARTONE Matt L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
31 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | LI Ray | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% | |
34 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
35 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 23% | |
36 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 2% |
37 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
38 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
39 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% | |
40 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
41 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
42 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
43 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
44 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
44 | BRASSARD Calvin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
46 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 29% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | |
47 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
48 | REINEKE Alexander | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
49 | WILSON Ian G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
50 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
51 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
52 | PORTER Corin | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
53 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
54 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
55 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
56 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
57 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
58 | STEVENSON Ryan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
59 | O'BRIEN Eamon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
60 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
61 | REINEKE Gerhard | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
62 | SPRINGER Elijah | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
64 | WOHL Martin A. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
66 | WOLFORD Benjamin | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
67 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
68 | BEEVER Logan | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | ||
69 | GU Eric | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
71 | HERRICK Michael | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
72 | SEILS Aether | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
73 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
74 | VILLARS Philip | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.