Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 64% |
2 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
3 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
3 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
5 | LIU Josh | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
6 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
7 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
8 | BRUNO Timothy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 10% | |
9 | CELECKI Barrett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 21% |
10 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
11 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
12 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
13 | AMBROSE Katie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
14 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
15 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | ISAACSON Calev | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
17 | MACMILLAN Collin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
18 | ZHOU Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
19 | KENT V David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
20 | VARGAS Fernando | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
21 | MU Jason | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - | |
22 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 10% | - |
23 | EYMAN Hans | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | |
24 | SHULL Marc | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
25 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | |
26 | LONG Sam | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
27 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
29 | LOMBARDO Declan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
30 | HOEHLE Stacy A. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
31 | MAGNUSON Thomas | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | KENT Laurel | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
33 | ISAACSON Henny | 100% | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
34 | LONG Ethan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
35 | MUENKE Torben | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | FROIDEVAUX Benjamin | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | WYLIE Luke | 100% | 94% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.