Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOMER Daryl D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
2 | DODDO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
3 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
3 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
5 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
5 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 35% |
7 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 15% |
8 | SARON Mitchell S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
9 | WESTERN Rafael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
10 | DI TELLA Pascual M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
11 | MA Jonathan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 7% |
12 | BOOTH Zaheer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 5% | |
13 | TE VELDE Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 3% |
14 | PARK Donghwan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
15 | PERRIER Clement | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
16 | STONE Ben | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 5% | - | |
17 | WALKER Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 25% | |
18 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 22% | |
19 | SOUDERS Peter F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
20 | HARLEY Colby A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
21 | SHAINBERG Jonah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
22 | REESE Aaron S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
23 | IGOE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 43% | |
23 | KARAM Tariq A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% | |
25 | SKEETE Kamar A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
26 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
27 | SIERADZKY Dawson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
28 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
29 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
30 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | |
31 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
32 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
33 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% | |
34 | SPEAR Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
35 | ATTIG Will T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
36 | COSTIN Michael V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
37 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
38 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
39 | SHIN Richard J.H. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
40 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | 1% |
41 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
42 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
43 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
44 | LEUNG Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
45 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
46 | MARSEE James | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
47 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
49 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
50 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
52 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
53 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
54 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
54 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | - | |
56 | KIM Sean G. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
57 | BOLTON Dawson E. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
57 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
59 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
60 | DEMAREST Iain | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
61 | MOON Sean H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
62 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
63 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
64 | HU William | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
65 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
66 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | JULIEN William A | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
68 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
68 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
70 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
71 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
72 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
73 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
74 | FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
75 | TONG Qilin | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - | |
76 | BRADFORD Blake | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
77 | CLARKSON Cole | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
78 | SMITH David C. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
79 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
80 | COTTER Liam | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
80 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
80 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
80 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
84 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | - |
85 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
86 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
87 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
88 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
89 | CICHOCKI David K. | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
90 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
91 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
92 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
93 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.