DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
| 2 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 11% | |
| 3 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 14% | |
| 3 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
| 6 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 7 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 8 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 97% | 66% | 19% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 10 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 11 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 12 | HULL Liam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 13 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 14 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 7% | |
| 15 | YU Jason | 100% | 99% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 94% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | TIKHONOV Ilia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | |
| 18 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 19 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 20 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 21 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
| 22 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | COFFEY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 24 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 25 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 26 | LEE Anton | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 97% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | OZBAY Alp | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 29 | GANZY Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 30 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 31 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | LIN Haley | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 37 | MARTELL Antonio | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.