The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Ariel | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
2 | PACHECO Carys | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
3 | XU Jessica | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
3 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
5 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
6 | HEPLER Sarah | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
7 | HOFMAN Haejung | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
8 | CHIEM Karen | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
9 | SUN Karolyn | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
10 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 2% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
11 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
12 | BUCA Nora | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | YUNG Bethany | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
14 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
15 | ENRILE Erica | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
16 | MADRID Maureen | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
17 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
18 | KROTZ Gemma | 10% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
19 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
20 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
21 | ZU Jacqueline | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
22 | DALEY Keira | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
23 | BUDMAN Ava | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
24 | BLANCO Ariia | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
25 | TESLENKO Ekaterina | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
26 | GURROLA Michal | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
27 | SMITH Marissa | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.