Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MADDES Gage | - | - | 5% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 2% |
| 2 | CHOU Ryland | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 3 | WHITE Riley | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 3 | ZMUDA Jordan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 5 | SMITH Dominic | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 3% |
| 6 | DEYOUNG Dominic | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 12% |
| 7 | ZMUDA Brady | 1% | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.