Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 2% |
| 2 | CHOU Ryland | 100% | 85% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 3 | WHITE Riley | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 3 | ZMUDA Jordan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 5 | SMITH Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% |
| 6 | DEYOUNG Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | ZMUDA Brady | 100% | 99% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.