New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 2 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% |
| 3 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 3 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 5 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
| 6 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | < 1% |
| 7 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 8 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
| 10 | MICHNA Colin P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 12 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 13 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
| 14 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 15 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 17% |
| 17 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 19 | ATEFI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
| 20 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 4% |
| 21 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 22 | BELEV Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 24 | LO Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 27 | TREJO Oliver | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 29 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 31 | GINSBURG Daniel | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 33 | BIDWELL Ryder | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DOLSKI Jack | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 35 | FARDELLA Angelo | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 37 | HONG Justin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MACKINNON Henry | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 44 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 5% | |
| 45 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | DUNAL Daniel | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SHTEIN Yan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | BURDAN Gabriel | 100% | 85% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | RENNER Henry | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SHI Erick | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BOVE Roman | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 54 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 55 | WU Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 56 | ELLIS John (Jack) | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | GILBERT Spencer E. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HUANG Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 60 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | BERG Patrick | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.