Zink Gyms A and B, Indiana University of PA - Indiana, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KENNEDY christo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 2 | MAYER-STALEY Jace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | LEE Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 3 | CHANG Zane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 5 | LITTWIN Korra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 6 | TARCHICHI Robby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | |
| 7 | HANOVER Augustine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 8 | SIMONS Adrienne | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | CHANG Xavier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 10 | KREUTEL Harrison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 3% | - |
| 11 | KIM Yoonsoo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | 2% |
| 12 | COPENHAVER Edward | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 22% | 2% | |
| 13 | CARELLI Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HAIZAMMURI Amirul Ikmal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 15 | MISHRA Roshan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 16 | NELIS Jude | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 17 | YODER Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 18 | COYLE Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 6% |
| 19 | RUBIATO Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | BHANDARI Trevor | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | LEE Hans | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 22 | JIANG Zhanyu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | KABUS Ethan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 3% |
| 24 | DROOG Lydia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | MYRICK Kaitlyn | 100% | 61% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | CRAMER Lily | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | WEBER Bryan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | FORNEY Cadence | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 29 | YU Chien-Hui | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SODOWSKY Thomas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BENNETT Shay | 100% | 73% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | RODRIGUEZ Andrea | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOWARTH Taylor | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MCKAY Cadence | 100% | 92% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.