New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PAK Kaitlyn | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | VALADEZ Emily T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 5 | XIKES Katherine E. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | LEE Sophia | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 7 | KRYLOVA Valery | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | SU Emma | V D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | RHIE Lena | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 11 | NEWELL Alexia C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | HILD Nisha | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | JIN Olivia P. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | O'HARA Eimile J. | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 15 | CHIANG Emily | D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | WHEELER Kira | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 17 | BAKER Audrey C. | V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 18 | YUAN Greta | V V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | SHIH Christina | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | OWENS Celine A. | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Rongruo | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | BILILIES Sophia | D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | DONG Zihan | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 26 | TRIBUSH Shayna | D D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | YU Melinda | V V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | ROCCA Mary J. | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | WHALEN Paige C. | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 30 | FAY Zoe A. | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | MCCARTHY Natalie | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | SULLIVAN Caroline | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 36 | FAUSTINO Emily | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 37 | HORMEL Molly | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.