New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
| 2 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% | |
| 3 | VALADEZ Emily T. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 5 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | |
| 6 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 7 | KRYLOVA Valery | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 8 | SU Emma | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 9 | RHIE Lena | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 36% | 3% | |
| 10 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 11 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 12 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 13 | JIN Olivia P. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | CHIANG Emily | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | |
| 16 | WHEELER Kira | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 18 | YUAN Greta | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 19 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHIH Christina | - | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | OWENS Celine A. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% | |
| 22 | ZHANG Rongruo | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 23 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 5% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 1% | |
| 24 | DONG Zihan | 2% | 30% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | TRIBUSH Shayna | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 27 | YU Melinda | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | ROCCA Mary J. | 3% | 34% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | WHALEN Paige C. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | FAY Zoe A. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | MCCARTHY Natalie | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | 16% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | FAUSTINO Emily | 66% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HORMEL Molly | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.