Southwest Recreation Center - Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IRWIN Peter | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 2 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 37% |
| 3 | JACKSON James | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 3 | LIDSKY Phineas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 5 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 6 | KELLEY Hayden | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | MUMMIDI Rishi | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 9 | SHIVELY Cole T. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | DUPREE Thomas | - | - | 1% | 15% | 51% | 33% | |
| 12 | CHENG Thomas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 35% | 6% |
| 13 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | - | 1% | 11% | 47% | 35% | 6% | |
| 14 | KOSSMANN Alexander | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 35% | |
| 15 | RASSEL John | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 16 | TYSON Charlie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 46% | 10% |
| 17 | SALLAM Omar | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 15% |
| 18 | DINKINS Adam | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 19 | FREY Wayne N. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 20 | CLAYTON Robert | - | - | - | 4% | 46% | 50% | |
| 21 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% | |
| 22 | RODDENBERRY Steven | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | OLSON Clayton M. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | FRAGER Soleil | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | BEATTY Thomas | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KARPF Jonah | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | SEEDS Aidan | 2% | 19% | 53% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | WYNN Paul | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | STEPHENSON William | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | SIENRA Xabier | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% | |
| 34 | RODA Thaleia | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | BATISTA Julian | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 33% | 3% | |
| 36 | DASILVA Mia | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | PACILIO Jacob | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 38 | LOPEZ Lincoln | - | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | ARIANAS Elias | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | HUSZAR Sara | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 41 | HAWKINS Sophia | 1% | 10% | 37% | 43% | 9% | - | |
| 42 | GUO Lucas | 1% | 33% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | LE BLANC Anna | 7% | 51% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 44 | HERARD Weiman | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | NARANJO Andrew | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | BAINO Lorenzo | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 47 | RAUDALES Nicolas | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | WERTH Mario | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 49 | CULLEN Reilly | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | MCFARLAND John G. | - | 25% | 47% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | COATES Gregory | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 52 | GREGORY Aedan | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | CARRERO Quentin | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | BENTON Kira | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 55 | HART Justin | 26% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LANGUASCO Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 56 | BEST Sydney | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | HUANG Arthur | 23% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | GRIFFITHS Wesley | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | MOSCOSO SERRANO Andrea | 49% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | GUADAMUZ Cesar | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SAYER Laura | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | NGUYEN Catarina | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | PHAM Hailey | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | CHAVARIN Alessandro | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.