New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
2 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
3 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
3 | WEHLE Paul | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
5 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 2% |
6 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
7 | OWENS William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
8 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
9 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
10 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
11 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
12 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 18% |
13 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% |
14 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
15 | LO Joshua H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
16 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
17 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
18 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
19 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
20 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
21 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
23 | ATEFI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
24 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
25 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
26 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
27 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
28 | TREJO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
29 | GARCIA Ryan | 100% | 94% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
30 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
32 | MARGIL Matthew | 100% | 85% | 51% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
33 | BELEV Nicholas | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
34 | WALLACE William Ronan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
35 | LOURENCO Dexter | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | WU Max | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
38 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
39 | BLACKBURN Henry | 100% | 86% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
41 | GILBERT Spencer E. | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.