Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ABRAM Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
2 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | |
3 | JAN Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 37% |
3 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% |
5 | TANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 17% |
6 | BEASLEY Julien | 100% | 100% | 94% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - |
7 | GLOZMAN Pasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 15% | |
8 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 37% | |
9 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | 1% |
10 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 10% | |
11 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
12 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
13 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% |
14 | CLAYTON Byron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% |
15 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - |
16 | BHATT Jay | 100% | 96% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | |
17 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% | |
18 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 21% | 2% |
19 | HOLCOMB Michael | 100% | 46% | 7% | < 1% | - | - | |
20 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 19% | - |
21 | ZEISS Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 24% | 2% | - |
22 | NARY William J. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
23 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 81% | 27% | 2% | - | - | |
24 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
25 | PHILLIPS Jasper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 33% | 7% | - |
26 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 100% | 90% | 39% | 5% | - | - |
27 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 16% | |
28 | JONES Bryan T. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
29 | BROWN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 49% | 11% | - | |
30 | GARDNER William | 100% | 96% | 67% | 16% | 1% | - | |
31 | WALTERS John | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
32 | AMMAR Sam | 100% | 59% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
33 | TEARSE Robert G. | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
34 | GELLER Alan S. | 100% | 94% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
35 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 97% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
36 | VAN STEIN Thomas | 100% | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | PATTON Leland | 100% | 24% | - | - | - | - | - |
38 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
39 | KLEINMAN Joseph | 100% | 55% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.