400 Peter Bryce Blvd. - Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 2 | KRAFFT Douglas | - | - | 2% | 20% | 49% | 29% | |
| 3 | RAY William | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 5 | LIU Oscar | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 6 | CHALMERS Thomas | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | PAYNE Gareth | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 9 | ELEY Ellis | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 11 | BELL Leo | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | CALINSKY Edward | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
| 13 | DALY Daniel | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 14 | ZIELINSKI Alexander | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% | |
| 15 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 16 | JOHNSTON Jacob | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | WENTWORTH Ashley | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | PIERCE Chandon | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 4% | |
| 19 | KERTESZ Stefan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | KNOX Aidan | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | FORD Tillman | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 45% | 6% | |
| 22 | MASSIE Jay Thomas | 8% | 41% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GOINS Isaac | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 41% | 15% | |
| 24 | DEMAREE Matthew | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 26 | OGLE Bennett | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | MACGREGOR Alexander | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | SOPER Adam | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 29 | PUREFOY Malik | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 30 | POWERS Robert | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 31 | BRELAND Craig | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | HUNTER James | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | EDWARDS John | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 34 | AGUILLON Alexis | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | WATKINS Christopher | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | MARSHALL Jaden | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 37 | HALVERSON Spencer | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | MEILAN William | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | VON KLAR Rhiannon | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | MANNING Jackson | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 41 | CHAILLOU Jonah | 1% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | - | |
| 42 | SIMPSON John | 7% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | WASH James | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | FULLER Patrick | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | PEACOCK Audrey | 35% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | REYNOLDS Natalie | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HUGHES Devon | 4% | 43% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.