Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
2 | AVETISIAN Alexander | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
3 | WANG Joey | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
5 | KIM Teddy | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 31% | |
6 | LIANG Donny | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
7 | WONG Baron | - | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 38% | |
8 | MCLAREN Mason | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
9 | DENISON Declan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
10 | CHARETTE Alex | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
11 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 49% | 40% | |
12 | KIM Remington | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
13 | LEE Royce | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
14 | MAXU Tiger | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
15 | PARKE Nathaniel | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
16 | DAO Alexander | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
17 | VOO Lucas | 3% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 4% | < 1% | |
18 | HINTON Evan | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 1% |
19 | POSSON Luke | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
20 | WU Johnny y. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
21 | SHIN Ryan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
22 | RONG Gordon | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
23 | BERTEL Florian | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
24 | COLLINS Kaden | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | DENG haoyu | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | CHEONG Cameron | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
27 | GADHVI Darius | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | AVETISIAN Michael | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | GREENMAN Duke | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% | - | |
30 | RAHMAN Zayd | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
31 | KIM Daniel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
32 | WOO Lucas | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
33 | CAMP Ryder | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
34 | HAMILTON Travis | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
35 | CHARETTE Matt | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
36 | PORIKLI Sedat | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
37 | LIN Daniel | 34% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
39 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | RAHMAN Ali | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | WANG Dylan | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
42 | GRAHAM Jacob | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
43 | KOU Mason | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
44 | MA Ciel | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
45 | MCCULLOUGH Kevin | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
46 | SARMIENTO Luke | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.