Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 49% | |
| 2 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 3 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 21% | |
| 5 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 6 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 7 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 8 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 9 | LEE Abin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
| 10 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 11 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 12 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | |
| 13 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | < 1% |
| 14 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 15 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 16 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 32% |
| 17 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 18 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 19 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 21 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 22 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | CHAU Ivan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 5% |
| 25 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% | |
| 26 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 15% | 1% | |
| 28 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | PAN Gary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | JIN Xueyuan George | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 31 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ROUS Miguel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 33 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | XIE Raymond | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 35 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 36 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 38 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 42 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 43 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | SU Aiden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 46 | CHAO ABU MINGZE | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 47 | WILLIAMS Thomas | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | WANG William | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 49 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 50 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | LI Mason | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | XU Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 52 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 54 | HARDWICK Alex | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 57 | DENG Albert | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | LI Eric | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | HANLEY Jack | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 81% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 62 | CHUNG Royce | 100% | 93% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | PAGNIELLO Francesco | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | HOARE Gabriel | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | YU Ryan | 100% | 70% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 67 | LIM Cayden | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | SIN TaeHwan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | JAGANNATHAN Avi | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | MARVEL Elliot | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 72 | NEMIROVSKY Evan | 100% | 98% | 74% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 73 | LUND Jonah | 100% | 46% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.