Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TRAN Spencer | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | AHMED Mohsen | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
3 | MANSFIELD Hunter | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
3 | KABA Elias | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
5 | MORI Seneca | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | PARIGIAN Alexander | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
7 | TSIEN Richard | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | SZCZAPA Lukas | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
10 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | MANUEL Eli | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
12 | HE Bronto | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | ZHENG Jason | D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
14 | CHO Adrian | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | MOZZER Nolan | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | FOGEL Jake | V D V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
17 | CHEN Tianjun | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
18 | CHEN Jayden A | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
19 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
20 | CHEN Evan | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
21 | LAI Jayden | D V D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
22 | GAO Ryan | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
23 | LAU LUCAS | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
24 | SMITH Theo | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
25 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | V V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
26 | CHAVES Evan | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | HEMPHILL Kurt | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | LEE Harrison | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | KESELMAN Ron | V D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
30 | CHEN Daniel | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
31 | TANG Luke | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
32 | ROBINSON Blake | V D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
33 | CHAN Tyler | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | ZINCHUK Yuri | D V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
35 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
36 | ROBINSON Garrett | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | CIANCHETTA David | D V V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
38 | QI Bryan | V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
39 | DIXON Miles | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
40 | YU George | V D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
41 | HAN Nathan | V D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
42 | GILLARD Adan | V D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
43 | MANN Daniel | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
44 | FAUCHER James | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
45 | SHI Evan | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
46 | LANE Sawyer | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
47 | BENNETT Nathaniel | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
48 | CHEN Hayden | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
49 | LAZORISAK Andrew | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
50 | CHIANG William | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
51 | GU Eric | D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
52 | ROFINO Samuel | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
53 | BRESLAV Asher | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
54 | DAI Jason | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
55 | DING Charlie | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
56 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
57 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
57 | LEE Ryan | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
59 | CHEN Cameron | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
60 | WILLIAMS Gavin | D D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
61 | HOLBROOK Silas | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
62 | LANDMAN Martin | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
63 | LI Jayden | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
64 | MCGANN Grant | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
65 | YOON Jonathan | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
66 | SONPAL Winslow | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
67 | AKEHURST MOORE Ian | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
68 | SCOGGIN Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
69 | GREGORY Milo | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
---|---|---|
Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.