Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TRAN Spencer | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | AHMED Mohsen | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
3 | MANSFIELD Hunter | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
3 | KABA Elias | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
5 | MORI Seneca | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | PARIGIAN Alexander | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
7 | TSIEN Richard | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | SZCZAPA Lukas | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
10 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | MANUEL Eli | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
12 | HE Bronto | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | ZHENG Jason | D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
14 | CHO Adrian | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | MOZZER Nolan | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | FOGEL Jake | V D V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
17 | CHEN Tianjun | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
18 | CHEN Jayden A | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
19 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
20 | CHEN Evan | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
21 | LAI Jayden | D V D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
22 | GAO Ryan | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
23 | LAU LUCAS | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
24 | SMITH Theo | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
25 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | V V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
26 | CHAVES Evan | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | HEMPHILL Kurt | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | LEE Harrison | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | KESELMAN Ron | V D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
30 | CHEN Daniel | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
31 | TANG Luke | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
32 | ROBINSON Blake | V D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
33 | CHAN Tyler | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | ZINCHUK Yuri | D V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
35 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
36 | ROBINSON Garrett | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | CIANCHETTA David | D V V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
38 | QI Bryan | V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
39 | DIXON Miles | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
40 | YU George | V D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
41 | HAN Nathan | V D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
42 | GILLARD Adan | V D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
43 | MANN Daniel | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
44 | FAUCHER James | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
45 | SHI Evan | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
46 | LANE Sawyer | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
47 | BENNETT Nathaniel | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
48 | CHEN Hayden | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
49 | LAZORISAK Andrew | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
50 | CHIANG William | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
51 | GU Eric | D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
52 | ROFINO Samuel | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
53 | BRESLAV Asher | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
54 | DAI Jason | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
55 | DING Charlie | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
56 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
57 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
57 | LEE Ryan | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
59 | CHEN Cameron | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
60 | WILLIAMS Gavin | D D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
61 | HOLBROOK Silas | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
62 | LANDMAN Martin | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
63 | LI Jayden | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
64 | MCGANN Grant | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
65 | YOON Jonathan | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
66 | SONPAL Winslow | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
67 | AKEHURST MOORE Ian | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
68 | SCOGGIN Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
69 | GREGORY Milo | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.