National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 2 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 3 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 47% | 38% | |
| 5 | HALL Velma | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 6 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 29% |
| 7 | YU Jaime L. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 8 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 1% | 20% | 50% | 29% | |
| 9 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 19% | ||
| 10 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 41% | 11% |
| 11 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 13 | YE Eileen | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 24% | |
| 14 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | ||
| 15 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
| 16 | YU Lauren C. | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | VIANNA Gabriella | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 18 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 19 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 22 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 9% | 49% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 32% | 6% |
| 25 | WERBACH Esther | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | ||
| 26 | FELLUS Talia E. | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 28 | MI Anning | 4% | 32% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LIN Emma | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | XUE Alanna | 17% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 33 | SENIC Adeline | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 34 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 4% | 32% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | WEBB Ella | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | LIU Sophia | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 37 | LABELLE Audreanne | 62% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | 15% | 54% | 29% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | JU Maggie | 25% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | HERRIES Elsa | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | STAIKOS Eleni | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.