National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 2 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 3 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 38% | |
| 5 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 6 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
| 7 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 8 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 29% | |
| 9 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 19% | ||
| 10 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 11% |
| 11 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
| 12 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 13 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
| 14 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | ||
| 15 | PALMER Meredith K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 16 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | VIANNA Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 18 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 19 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 100% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 41% | 7% | |
| 23 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | 6% |
| 25 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | ||
| 26 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 28 | MI Anning | 100% | 96% | 64% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LIN Emma | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 33 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 34 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 96% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 37 | LABELLE Audreanne | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | 100% | 85% | 31% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | JU Maggie | 100% | 75% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | HERRIES Elsa | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | STAIKOS Eleni | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.