Motor City SYC/RCC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Saturday, March 1, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 POEI Lauren 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 64%
2 MUMMANENI Samyuta 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 43%
3 JIANG Chloe 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
3 PUTHOFF Olivia 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
5 WU Nicole Moxuan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
6 WU Chingfei Amber 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
7 HUSSIAN Annabelle 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 3%
8 LAI Miranda 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 16%
9 JOO Sara 100% 100% 92% 66% 28% 5%
10 YACOBUCCI Nadia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 55%
11 SHIN Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 11%
12 DESERANNO Seren 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 45% 8%
13 HUANG Natalie 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 9%
14 TAN Dorathy 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
15 HARRIS Parker 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 7%
16 BYK Karalina 100% 99% 94% 71% 35% 8% 1%
17 KRAHE Annika 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 54%
18 HOROWITZ Shuli 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
19 YANG Olivia 100% 99% 89% 57% 20% 3%
20 YIN Chloe 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 37% 8%
21 CULLIVAN Sienna 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 14%
22 RIVERA Leahy 100% 100% 96% 75% 35% 7%
23 WATSON Evelyn 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 13%
24 CHOI JULIE 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 29% 5%
25 BO Iris 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 30% 4%
26 NWODO Naila 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 26% 5%
27 CHANG Olivia 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 9% 1%
28 SINGH Evangelina 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
29 SWOPE Farren 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 33%
30 HO Peyton 100% 97% 78% 38% 8% -
31 LICHTENSTEIGER Megan 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
32 ZHANG Selina 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1%
33 KNAPP Isabella 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 13%
34 ADLER Zoe 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 6%
35 CHUNG Stella 100% 98% 78% 37% 9% 1%
36 DHALIWAL Seerat 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% -
37 SAMALA Reese 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 15% 1%
38 YANG Hanli 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 17% 2%
39 LI Christina 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6%
40 BOIKE Lucille 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 10%
41 LEO Jenna 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2%
42 GE Lena Lan 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7%
43 LI Junhan 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 31% 6%
44 GOITIA Genevieve 100% 92% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
45 LEE Jeemin 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 26%
46 MURPHY Genevieve 100% 98% 81% 45% 14% 2%
47 PAN Yiran 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 10%
48 XU Charlene 100% 96% 72% 30% 5% -
49 BAULIN Zoya 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
50 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada 100% 99% 91% 60% 19% 2%
51 FECHER Lily 100% 98% 82% 44% 11% 1%
52 LIN Kenzie 100% 99% 92% 66% 29% 7% 1%
53 NAFSOU Ava 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% - -
54 POEI Meagan 100% 73% 29% 6% 1% - -
55 CHEN Yinuo 100% 98% 83% 48% 17% 3% -
56 LIU Sophia 100% 98% 86% 52% 17% 2% -
57 KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily 100% 94% 66% 25% 5% - -
58 SUN Nicole 100% 92% 55% 17% 2% -
59 HAFEZ Sahar 100% 95% 74% 39% 12% 1%
60 YUAN Aiting 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 4%
61 MALIK Manha 100% 98% 77% 39% 11% 1%
62 LIN Avery 100% 82% 41% 11% 2% - -
63 YARLAGADDA Smaya 100% 43% 8% 1% - -
64 ETIKALA Saanvi 100% 64% 20% 3% - - -
65 LIN Athena 100% 63% 20% 3% - -
66 WANG Christina 100% 96% 69% 29% 6% -
67 MARTIN Sloan 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 15% 2%
68 KUANG Bella 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
69 YOUM Amelia 100% 97% 79% 42% 11% 1% -
69 HUANG Emma 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 2% -
71 FAN Melody 100% 66% 23% 4% - - -
72 ZHOU Jolena 100% 35% 6% - - -
73 PAEK Mila 100% 81% 37% 8% 1% -
74 LU Miaotian 100% 68% 23% 3% - -
75 WANG Helen Hoi Lam 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2% -
76 ZHANG Caroline 100% 92% 61% 23% 5% - -
77 KOZUB Joslyn 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
78 CHEN Aimee 100% 90% 54% 19% 3% - -
79 ZOLDAN Nolabelle 100% 88% 49% 14% 2% -
79 YIN Emily 100% 55% 16% 2% - -
81 HEWITT Madison 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
82 GENNARO Juliana 100% 41% 7% 1% - -
83 KIM Gia 100% 83% 42% 12% 2% - -
84 LEE Eun-Hae 100% 82% 39% 9% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.