National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 2 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 33% |
| 3 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 7% |
| 6 | HARLEY Colby A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% |
| 7 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 8 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 9 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 10 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 11 | ROPER Evan C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 12 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 13 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 13 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 15 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
| 18 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 19 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | PARK Collin D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LIN William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 24 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 25 | LUO ZIRUI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 27 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 28 | LU Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 29 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 30 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 31 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 32 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 33 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 34 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 35 | BECKER Matheus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | 2% |
| 37 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 43 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 44 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 45 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 47 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 48 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 50 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
| 52 | CONINE Tanner C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 53 | MADDALONE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 54 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 81% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | REN Richard | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 58 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | CHEN Oscar | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 65 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 66 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 67 | WRIGHT Athan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | HWANG Ryan C. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | HOUSE Jackson T. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 89% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | BLECKNER Noah | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 74 | CRISAFULLI Francesco R. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | FORT David | 100% | 96% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | YOUNG Sean | 100% | 98% | 78% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 92% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | SHEN Christopher | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 85 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 86 | BURNS Jackson P. | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 88 | COREY Michael A. | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | BELEV Nicholas | 100% | 78% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 91 | BOWMAN James | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.