Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | |
| 2 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 3 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 3 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 5 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
| 6 | TANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 7 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% | |
| 8 | DING Charlie | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 10 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | < 1% | |
| 11 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | FANG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 13 | YU George | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 1% | |
| 15 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 16 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 18 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 19 | DAI Jason | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | DIMOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 21 | RICK Dylan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | NOVAK Luke | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | BURDICK Elijah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 26 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 28 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | |
| 30 | SHI Evan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | QI Bryan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 32 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | DANA Miles | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | LI Jayden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LANDMAN Martin | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Jack | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 40 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
| 42 | IVANOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 43 | ALIMI Mousa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% | |
| 44 | SARKAR Aum | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 45 | ZOU Grant | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | CAVALLARO Xavier | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 47 | JIN Derek | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 49 | KLOTS Theo | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | MURPHY CHANCOGNE Quentin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 51 | EFFEL Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 25% | |
| 52 | LI Nolan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
| 52 | SCOGGIN Charles | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | TAN Wyatt | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 56 | GREGORY Milo | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | GOOD Adam | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | SCHELTZ Owen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | MILLER Brodrick | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 62 | TANG Jake | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | SON Joshua | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | LOGINOV Iurii | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.