The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 16% |
| 2 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | CHU Theodore | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 6 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 7 | MA Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 9 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 10 | GUO Luke | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | MCLAREN Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 13 | LI Grayson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | COHEN Joshua | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 15 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | ZGAMA Oleksii | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 18 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 19 | WANG Kyle | 100% | 89% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | XU Yanwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 21 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 22 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 24 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | NGUYEN Peyton | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | TOPPING Axel | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | ALLEGRETTI Zachary T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 28 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | HU Jingsen | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 32 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | QUARANTA James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | WONG Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 35 | BALUCAN Caelus | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | DENG Andes | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | HUANG Jen-Chieh | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KUO Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | LEE Wei-Sheng | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG jinghao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 41 | KOLHE Tanish | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | COLLINS Kaden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 43 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | MCLEAN Ian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 45 | CLARKE Elliot | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KOU Mason | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 48 | HAYDEN Benjamin | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.