Motor City SYC/RCC

Y-12 Women's Foil

Sunday, March 2, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 PUTHOFF Olivia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
2 CULLIVAN Sienna 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 33%
3 KRAHE Annika 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 67%
3 SHIN Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 53%
5 BYK Karalina 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 30%
6 SINGH Evangelina 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 56% 16%
7 BO Iris 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 18%
8 NWODO Naila 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 22%
9 MALIK Manha 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 45% 9%
10 MURPHY Genevieve 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
11 KNAPP Isabella 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 27%
12 YIN Chloe 100% 100% 100% 98% 90% 63% 24%
13 RIVERA Leahy 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 60% 11%
14 SUN Nicole 100% 97% 77% 42% 14% 2% -
15 LIU Sophia 100% 97% 81% 45% 12% 1%
16 DHALIWAL Seerat 100% 100% 90% 59% 22% 4% -
17 JOO Sara 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 58% 17%
18 YACOBUCCI Nadia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 66%
19 HUANG Natalie 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 28%
20 LEE Jeemin 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
21 DONG Iris 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 45%
22 KUANG Bella 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
23 ZHANG Selina 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 34% 4%
24 ETIKALA Saanvi 100% 99% 85% 49% 13% 1% -
25 YANG Hanli 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
26 BOIKE Lucille 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
27 ZHANG Caroline 100% 98% 85% 52% 17% 2%
28 KIM Yuna 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6% 1%
29 LEO Jenna 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
30 HUANG Rosalyn 100% 71% 28% 6% - -
31 ZHANG Priscilla 100% 100% 99% 92% 63% 19% 1%
32 CHAN Hailey 100% 100% 94% 69% 30% 6% -
33 HAFEZ Sahar 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
34 YOUM Amelia 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
35 ESMONDE-WHITE Daphne 100% 100% 94% 72% 32% 5%
36 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 7%
37 LIN Avery 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
38 KOU Elisha 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
39 IANNI Isabel 100% 100% 94% 71% 34% 8% 1%
40 LI Christina 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 33% 5%
41 XU Charlene 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 11% 1%
42 YANG Olivia 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
43 GOITIA Genevieve 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 21% 2%
44 KIM Gia 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 2% -
45 WELTER Gemma 100% 99% 87% 51% 15% 2% -
46 PAEK Mila 100% 98% 85% 48% 14% 2% -
47 LIN Athena 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% - -
48 MA Sophia 100% 100% 91% 61% 24% 4% -
49 HUANG Emma 100% 92% 60% 22% 4% -
50 WANG Helen Hoi Lam 100% 95% 73% 36% 9% 1%
51 YIN Emily 100% 93% 61% 23% 4% - -
52 GONZALEZ Lauren 100% 95% 61% 22% 4% - -
53 HO Peyton 100% 100% 92% 66% 29% 6% 1%
54 JU Victoria 100% 98% 83% 51% 20% 4% -
55 BELL Blake 100% 97% 77% 37% 8% 1% -
56 CHEN Aimee 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
57 SHUI Zola 100% 99% 89% 56% 18% 3% -
58 POEI Meagan 100% 88% 54% 19% 4% - -
59 CHEN Yinuo 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 12% 1%
60 WANG Christina 100% 100% 93% 68% 31% 7% 1%
61 KHETPAL Aalia 100% 99% 87% 53% 17% 2%
62 LEE Eun-Hae 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% -
63 SMART Athena 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 12% 2%
64 FAN Melody 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1% -
65 JONES Parker 100% 88% 52% 18% 3% - -
66 PAEK Ellie 100% 89% 56% 22% 5% 1% -
67 JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia 100% 73% 27% 5% - - -
68 LU Miaotian 100% 90% 59% 23% 5% - -
69 VELEZ Sofia 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
70 HEWITT Madison 100% 85% 43% 11% 1% - -
71 CHAVEZ Beatrix 100% 63% 22% 4% - - -
72 HO Avery 100% 57% 15% 2% - - -
73 EDGAR Koko 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
74 CULLIVAN Elise 100% 95% 74% 39% 12% 2% -
75 ARSOVSKI Maya 100% 84% 43% 12% 1% -
76 KASHUBA Mila 100% 99% 89% 63% 27% 5% -
77 FANG Savannah 100% 90% 52% 15% 2% - -
78 LEIBERMAN Talia 100% 55% 13% 1% - - -
79 FAROOQI Eliora 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% - -
80 KAGAN Natalie 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
80 WEST Mira 100% 68% 21% 3% - - -
82 JAGANNATHAN Aria 100% 27% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.