National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WONG Adrian | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
3 | TANG August L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
3 | DESHMUKH Arjun | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | LIN James G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
6 | HUTH Trevor | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
7 | MARX Jackson L. | V D D V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
8 | ZHEN Ethan | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
10 | LI Aaron | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
11 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | TANG Albert | V V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
13 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
14 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
15 | TANG Alexander L. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | TANG Owen S. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
17 | XU Andy P. | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
18 | GUO Justin | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
18 | CHEN Kyle P. | V D V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
20 | MATSAKH Philip | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
21 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | LIN Michael | D V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
23 | CHO Ethan H. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | QIAN Jason H. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
24 | YU Jason | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
26 | METTAPALLI Tarun | V V D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
27 | XIAO Benjamin | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
28 | PERSINGER Charles B. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
29 | AROUH Dylan | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
30 | PARK John L. | D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
31 | LI Matthew | D V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | MALHAM Andrew | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | ZHANG Alex | V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
34 | TANG Terry | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
35 | HUANG Eythan | D D D V V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
36 | HONG Logan | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
37 | SUAREZ Adrian | V D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
38 | SENIC Lucas | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
39 | WONG Jackson | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
40 | BROWNING Michael | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
41 | SHELDON Owen | D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
42 | BOBROW Silas | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
43 | MCLENDON Dario | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
44 | TAN Aidan | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
46 | XIE Eric | D D V D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
47 | GUTH Joseph | D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
48 | CATINO William | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
49 | JONES Jackson | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
50 | BESSELMAN Noah | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
51 | SONG Tony | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
52 | KOE Beckett | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
53 | ZDAN Dominic | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.