National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Adrian | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 2 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | TANG August L. | - | - | 4% | 29% | 46% | 21% | |
| 3 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 5 | LIN James G. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 6 | HUTH Trevor | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 7 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 8 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | |
| 10 | LI Aaron | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 12 | TANG Albert | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
| 14 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 16 | TANG Owen S. | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
| 17 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 18 | GUO Justin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
| 18 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 20 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
| 21 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | LIN Michael | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 23 | CHO Ethan H. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | YU Jason | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 26 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | XIAO Benjamin | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | PERSINGER Charles B. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | AROUH Dylan | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | PARK John L. | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LI Matthew | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MALHAM Andrew | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Alex | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | TANG Terry | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HUANG Eythan | 51% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | HONG Logan | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | SUAREZ Adrian | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | SENIC Lucas | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WONG Jackson | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BROWNING Michael | 34% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHELDON Owen | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 42 | BOBROW Silas | 16% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MCLENDON Dario | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | TAN Aidan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | XIE Eric | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GUTH Joseph | < 1% | 1% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 7% | |
| 48 | CATINO William | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | JONES Jackson | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | BESSELMAN Noah | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SONG Tony | 9% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | KOE Beckett | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZDAN Dominic | 54% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.