National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
5 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
8 | PAPADAKIS Lily | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
9 | MASSICK Laine | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | LUNG Katerina | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
11 | CHUSID Mikayla | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
12 | CHEN Kelly | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | PALMER Meredith K. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
14 | SERBAN Samantha M. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
15 | VIANNA Gabriella | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
16 | XU Christine | D V V D D | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
17 | MICHAELSEN Emily | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | KIM Rachael | V V V V D V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
19 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
20 | WONG Sophia M. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
22 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
23 | CHEN Allison V. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
24 | YE Eileen | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
25 | HALL Velma | V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
27 | UPTON Elizabeth | V V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
28 | CHEN Lefu | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
29 | JING Emily | D V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
30 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
31 | WEBB Ella | D V V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
32 | SENIC Adeline | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
33 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
34 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V D | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
35 | WANDJI Anais | V D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
36 | ZHANG Alina C. | V V V D D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
37 | XU Madison | V D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
38 | SIMONOV Dasha | V D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
38 | MI Anning | V V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
40 | ZHAO Sophie L. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
41 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
42 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
43 | LIN Emma | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
44 | YU Lauren C. | D D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
45 | SHEN Lydia | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
46 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
48 | RASO Olivia | D V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
49 | COOPER Piper W. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
50 | SOLDATOVA Maria | V V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
51 | BASSIK Eva | V V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
52 | YU Jaime L. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
53 | FELLUS Talia E. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
54 | WANG Chloe | V D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
55 | CHO Rebecca H. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
56 | NORTH Zoe M. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
57 | HAYES Alyssa R. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
58 | XUE Alanna | V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
59 | LIU Sophia | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
60 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
61 | FU Qihan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
62 | SU Michelle | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
63 | LEE Fiona E. | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
64 | DAVIES Ellie | D D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
66 | LABELLE Audreanne | D D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
67 | SEO IRENE Y. | D D D V V D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
70 | SHELDON Lucy A. | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
71 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | V V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
72 | LI Sophia M. | V D D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
73 | STAIKOS Eleni | V V D D D D | D | 0.2 | 2 | +1.8 |
74 | WEI Vika | V D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
75 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
76 | ROY Layla | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
77 | LIN Victoria T. | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
77 | WANG Cynthia | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
79 | LEE Lavender | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
80 | DATLA Meha | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | LANIER Isabelle R. | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
82 | DATLA Medha | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
83 | SMITH Emilee E. | D D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
84 | ZULUETA Catherine | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
85 | ALEXANDER Amelia | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
86 | KOGAN Stella | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
87 | PISHARODI smriti | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
88 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
89 | DEGENHOLTZ Annabel G. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
89 | QIAN Zhiyan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
91 | FURST Chloe | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
92 | SCHMIDT Victoria | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
93 | KOGAN Alexis | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
94 | RICHMAN Sofia | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
95 | MULLENS Erin | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
96 | LEVY Avery | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
96 | MAHNKEN Rachel | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.