National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 5 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 5 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 8 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 9 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 38% |
| 10 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 23% |
| 11 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | CHEN Kelly | - | - | 3% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% |
| 14 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 15 | VIANNA Gabriella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 16 | XU Christine | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% | |
| 17 | MICHAELSEN Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | KIM Rachael | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
| 19 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
| 21 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | < 1% | - |
| 22 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 23 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | YE Eileen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 25 | HALL Velma | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
| 28 | CHEN Lefu | - | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 30 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 46% | 17% |
| 31 | WEBB Ella | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 33 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 34 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 12% |
| 35 | WANDJI Anais | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 37 | XU Madison | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 38 | MI Anning | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 9% |
| 41 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LIN Emma | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | YU Lauren C. | 2% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 46 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 48 | RASO Olivia | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 49 | COOPER Piper W. | 2% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BASSIK Eva | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | YU Jaime L. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | FELLUS Talia E. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 55 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | NORTH Zoe M. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | HAYES Alyssa R. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 58 | XUE Alanna | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | LIU Sophia | 2% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 3% |
| 61 | FU Qihan | 3% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SU Michelle | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 63 | LEE Fiona E. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | DAVIES Ellie | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | LABELLE Audreanne | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 70 | SHELDON Lucy A. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 71 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 72 | LI Sophia M. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 73 | STAIKOS Eleni | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | WEI Vika | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ROY Layla | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 77 | WANG Cynthia | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 79 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 80 | DATLA Meha | 18% | 43% | 31% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LANIER Isabelle R. | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | DATLA Medha | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | SMITH Emilee E. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | ZULUETA Catherine | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 85 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | KOGAN Stella | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | PISHARODI smriti | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | DEGENHOLTZ Annabel G. | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | QIAN Zhiyan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | FURST Chloe | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 92 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 23% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 93 | KOGAN Alexis | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 94 | RICHMAN Sofia | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 95 | MULLENS Erin | 5% | 63% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 96 | LEVY Avery | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | MAHNKEN Rachel | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.