15th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 9, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FULLERTON Houston T. - - - - 2% 21% 78%
2 MODULLA Yathin R. - 1% 8% 31% 46% 14%
3 GLENNON Sebastian J. - - - 3% 18% 47% 32%
3 CHUNG Andrew - 3% 14% 33% 36% 13% 1%
5 JACKSON James - - 3% 13% 30% 36% 18%
6 DAVIDENKO Alexander - - 1% 10% 36% 46% 6%
7 CHUNG Joshua - - - 5% 23% 45% 27%
8 KULIKOWSKI Adam J. - - 5% 21% 42% 31%
9 MOORE Jeremy S. - - - - 1% 18% 80%
10 WILSON Andrew T. 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
11 WANG Bryan - 1% 7% 27% 42% 22%
12 RAVI Arjun 4% 25% 39% 24% 7% 1%
13 LEE Winston 1% 9% 28% 35% 20% 6% 1%
14 LANGE Eric A. - 1% 6% 25% 46% 23%
15 JOHNSON Soren - 5% 27% 42% 22% 3% -
16 LEE Christopher 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
17 TRACY James 2% 13% 28% 31% 19% 6% 1%
18 NORMAN Christian - - 1% 13% 42% 44%
19 WEISSMAN Kai E. - - 1% 9% 39% 51%
20 LEWIS Jared - - 5% 24% 45% 25%
21 WANG Maxwell L. - - - 4% 24% 48% 23%
22 TIEMANN Landen - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
23 LABROZZI Aidan - - - 3% 22% 52% 23%
23 REDDY Daksh - 4% 25% 42% 24% 4% -
25 NGUYEN Audrey - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
26 CREMONA Diego Maria - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
27 LIN Kason 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
28 VILLANI Henry M. 1% 10% 33% 38% 16% 2%
29 WEBB Jacob T. - 4% 25% 43% 24% 4%
30 NGUYEN Hubert - - 2% 16% 47% 33% 2%
31 FREY Wayne N. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 8%
32 LIU Oscar 2% 16% 39% 33% 9% 1%
33 VALES Keyan - 1% 9% 33% 43% 14%
34 NEWMAN Taylor H. 3% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1% -
35 HERARD Weiman 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
36 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad 8% 31% 39% 19% 3% -
37 KRIEGER Jack - 1% 10% 31% 40% 16% 2%
38 TEITENBERG John F. - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
39 PAL Ian K. 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
40 ARZT Nicholas 1% 14% 40% 34% 10% 1% -
41 MUMMIDI Rishi 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% 1%
42 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. - - - 1% 7% 41% 52%
43 FRAGER Soleil 9% 30% 37% 20% 4% - -
44 BALKIR Thomas 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3% -
45 BETTS Kieran 1% 8% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
46 FAN Yuchen 1% 15% 38% 34% 10% 1%
47 ZHOU Alec Q. - - 4% 20% 44% 31%
48 BRAND Andrew 33% 43% 20% 4% - -
49 ROCKWELL Nolan 2% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
50 POBIS Chandler R. - - - 2% 14% 44% 40%
51 BETTS Jr Anthony P. - - 4% 15% 34% 35% 11%
52 DONGES Anna 1% 11% 34% 36% 15% 2% -
53 NICKERSON Oliver 8% 30% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
54 LIU Fengqi - 3% 21% 42% 29% 5% -
55 PAYNE Gareth - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 2%
56 PETE Landon 3% 15% 30% 30% 16% 4% -
57 MEREDITH Jeffrey 3% 21% 38% 27% 9% 1% -
58 BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael - 4% 27% 44% 22% 4% -
59 ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian 4% 43% 40% 12% 1% -
60 HWANG Brandon 2% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
61 SEEDS Aidan 11% 31% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
62 BEDULLA Asher - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
63 HAWKINS Sophia 2% 16% 40% 32% 9% 1% -
64 OLSON Clayton M. 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
65 LIU Elinda 1% 10% 30% 36% 20% 5% -
66 ATON Dave 1% 10% 31% 38% 17% 3% -
67 MITCHELL Philip D. 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
68 DO Joshua - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 2%
69 KUCIA Michael J. - - 3% 17% 45% 33% 2%
70 HARTIGAN Joe 1% 13% 41% 35% 10% 1% -
71 DOSS matthew 18% 53% 24% 4% - - -
71 LE BLANC Anna 21% 49% 26% 4% - - -
73 CUPO Anthony 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
74 TAK Jemi 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
75 BERNSTEIN Matthew B. 1% 17% 43% 31% 8% 1%
75 WERTH Mario 55% 36% 9% 1% - -
77 ZHOU alex 6% 35% 40% 17% 2% -
78 HUANG Arthur 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
79 KHEGAY Martin 61% 35% 4% - - - -
80 BARRETT John 20% 44% 29% 6% - - -
80 WANG Aaron 10% 40% 37% 12% 1% - -
82 BATISTA Julian 1% 14% 37% 35% 12% 1% -
83 KIM Sarah 45% 41% 13% 2% - - -
84 GEISSLER Maximilian 29% 50% 18% 2% - -
85 WHITE Taylor 5% 27% 40% 23% 5% -
86 KWON Jason 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
87 HUGHES Eric < 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
87 SOKOLOWSKI Olivia 83% 16% 1% - - -
89 SHAKULA Matvey 60% 33% 7% 1% - -
90 CHEN Andrew 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
91 TYMOFIEIEVA Arina 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
91 BENTON Kira 13% 46% 31% 8% 1% - -
93 MA Victor 25% 41% 26% 7% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.