Tufts University - Medford, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | D D D V V V V D V V V D V V V D V V V | 13.4 | 13 | -0.4 | |
| 2 | ONIK Elijah | V D V V V V D V V V V V V V V D V V D | 8.6 | 15 | +6.4 | |
| 3 | KUMBLA Samarth | V D V D V V V V V V V V D D D V D V V V D | 15.0 | 14 | -1.0 | |
| 4 | KAO Castor | D V V D D V V V D D D V D V D V V D D V | 10.9 | 10 | -0.9 | |
| 5 | CHEN Andrew | D D V V V D V V V D V V D D D D V V V V | 13.2 | 12 | -1.2 | |
| 7 | BANERJEE Anup | V V D V D V D D D V V V V V V D D D V D | 8.7 | 11 | +2.3 | |
| 8 | YU Vinni | V V D D V V D V V V V V V D V D V D D D | 10.0 | 12 | +2.0 | |
| 9 | YANG Adam | V V V D V D D V V V D D D D V V D D V D | 8.8 | 10 | +1.2 | |
| 10 | ZHANG Henry | D V V V D D V V D V V V V D V D D D D V D | 10.7 | 11 | +0.3 | |
| 12 | KIM Nicholas | D V D V V D D V D D D D D D D D V V | 9.7 | 6 | -3.7 | |
| 13 | ZHANG Daniel | V V V V V V D D D V V | 7.3 | 8 | +0.7 | |
| 14 | BINDER Zach | V V V D V V D D D V | 6.6 | 6 | -0.6 | |
| 15 | YEROKHIN Michael | D V V D V V D V D V V V D D | 7.5 | 8 | +0.5 | |
| 16 | WONG Adam | V D V D D V V D D D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 | |
| 17 | BARTEL Jacob | V D V V D V V D D D D D V D D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 | |
| 18 | ZHANG Andy | D V V V V D D V D D | 6.4 | 5 | -1.4 | |
| 19 | KWON Ethan | V V V V D D D D V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 | |
| 20 | NUNNINK Phillip | D V D V V D V D D D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 | |
| 21 | HU Oliver | V V V V V D D D D D D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 | |
| 22 | SULLIVAN Jack | D V D V D | 2.0 | 2 | - | |
| 23 | CHEN James | V D V V | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 | |
| 24 | XIAO Enoch | D D D V | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 25 | CHENG Matthew | V D V V D D V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 | |
| 26 | BELLUOMO David | D D V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 27 | LEE Jacob | V V V V V D D D D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 | |
| 28 | DICKSON Farr | D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
| 29 | KO Christian | D V D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 32 | COSTELLO Chaissen | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
| 34 | GOBBO Alexander | V D D D D D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
| 35 | CAPRA Ethan | V V V D D D D D D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 | |
| 36 | PROSOLI Lovro | V V D D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 37 | FORTUNE Alex | V D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 38 | SMITH Grant | D V V | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 | |
| 39 | WADLEY Brendan | V D D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 40 | LIN Richard | D D V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
| 41 | LIU Niles | D D D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 | |
| 42 | TRAUGOT Brady | D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.