Tufts University - Medford, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAZUR Daniil | V V V V V V V V V V V V D V V V V V V | 11.9 | 18 | +6.1 | |
| 2 | HADDAD Justin | D V V V V D V V V D V D V V V D V D V V | 13.8 | 14 | +0.2 | |
| 3 | IMREK Samuel | V D V V V V D V D V V D D V D V V V V D V | 13.8 | 14 | +0.2 | |
| 4 | LIVERANT Skyler | V V D V D V V V D V D V V V D V D V D V | 12.1 | 13 | +0.9 | |
| 6 | LAWSON Henry | V D V V V V V V D V V V V V V V D V D V D | 13.8 | 16 | +2.2 | |
| 7 | ZHANG Nicholas | V V V V V V D D V V D V V D V D D V D | 13.0 | 12 | -1.0 | |
| 8 | KUSHNERIK Ethan | V V V V D D D V D D V D D D V D D V V V | 11.7 | 10 | -1.7 | |
| 10 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | V V V V D D V V V V V V D D V D D V D D D | 9.2 | 12 | +2.8 | |
| 11 | YU Colin | V D D V V D V V V V D D D D D D D D D V V | 9.8 | 9 | -0.8 | |
| 12 | NORTH Alexander | V D V D V V V V V V V D D D V D D D D D | 6.1 | 10 | +3.9 | |
| 13 | LEE Daniel | D V V D D V D V D V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 | |
| 14 | WEISE Eli | D V V D D D V D D D | 3.0 | 3 | - | |
| 15 | TAFUR Alexander | V D D V V D D V D V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 | |
| 16 | COLLYMORE Spencer | D D V V V D V D D D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 | |
| 17 | LIU Patrick | V V V V V V D D V D D | 7.9 | 7 | -0.9 | |
| 18 | GAO Daniel | V V V D D D D D V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 | |
| 19 | LONCAR Luka | D D V V V D D D D V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 | |
| 20 | LI Brian | V V V V D V D D V V D D V D D D | 6.8 | 8 | +1.2 | |
| 21 | ZHU Wilson | V V D V V D D D D D D V | 7.1 | 5 | -2.1 | |
| 22 | HUGHES Levi | D D D V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 | |
| 23 | HUANG Thomas | D D D V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 24 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V D D D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 25 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V V D D D D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 26 | SHAMIS Mark | V D D D D V | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 | |
| 27 | MURPHY Thomas | D V D D D V | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 | |
| 28 | ZHANG Alec | D D V D D V D D V | 0.1 | 3 | +2.9 | |
| 29 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | V D D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
| 30 | YU Hunter | D D V D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 31 | GRAMS Steven | D D V D D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 | |
| 32 | STRAUSS Luke | D D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 32 | PONIKVAR Lars | V D V V D D D D D V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 | |
| 34 | GREEN Jabreel | V V D D D D D D V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 | |
| 35 | SHIV Rishi | D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
| 36 | JAMISON Harper | D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.