Tufts University - Medford, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | ||
1 | MAZUR Daniil | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 13% | 18% | 20% | 17% | 12% | 6% | 2% | 1% | < 1% | - | ||
2 | HADDAD Justin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 13% | 18% | 20% | 18% | 11% | 5% | 2% | - | - | |
3 | IMREK Samuel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 8% | 13% | 17% | 19% | 17% | 12% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - |
4 | LIVERANT Skyler | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 6% | 11% | 16% | 19% | 18% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |
6 | LAWSON Henry | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 4% | 8% | 13% | 17% | 19% | 17% | 12% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - |
7 | ZHANG Nicholas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 2% | 6% | 12% | 17% | 21% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 2% | - | - | ||
8 | KUSHNERIK Ethan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 8% | 14% | 18% | 19% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | |
10 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 6% | 11% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 13% | 8% | 4% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
11 | YU Colin | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 8% | 14% | 18% | 19% | 16% | 11% | 6% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
12 | NORTH Alexander | - | - | 2% | 6% | 12% | 18% | 20% | 17% | 12% | 7% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
13 | LEE Daniel | - | - | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | ||||||||||
14 | WEISE Eli | 2% | 11% | 24% | 29% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
15 | TAFUR Alexander | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 26% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||
16 | COLLYMORE Spencer | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 28% | 26% | 15% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||
17 | LIU Patrick | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 22% | 28% | 23% | 10% | 2% | ||||||||||
18 | GAO Daniel | - | - | 2% | 9% | 21% | 28% | 24% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | |||||||||||
19 | LONCAR Luka | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 22% | 25% | 20% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||||
20 | LI Brian | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 21% | 23% | 18% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
21 | ZHU Wilson | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 19% | 24% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||||
22 | HUGHES Levi | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |||||||||||||||
23 | HUANG Thomas | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
24 | NIKOLOV Peter | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | ||||||||||||||||
25 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | |||||||||||||||
26 | SHAMIS Mark | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | |||||||||||||||
27 | MURPHY Thomas | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - | |||||||||||||||
28 | ZHANG Alec | 93% | 7% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
29 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 1% | 58% | 34% | 6% | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
30 | YU Hunter | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
31 | GRAMS Steven | - | < 1% | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% | ||||||||||||||||
32 | STRAUSS Luke | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
32 | PONIKVAR Lars | - | 2% | 12% | 25% | 30% | 21% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
34 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 2% | 15% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
35 | SHIV Rishi | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | ||||||||||||||||
36 | JAMISON Harper | 1% | 39% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.