Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
2 | YOON Ian | D D V D V | V V V V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
3 | GEVA Reuben | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | ZHANG Aiden | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
5 | LEE Lucas | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
6 | LI Stephen | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
7 | WONG Kyle | V V D V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
8 | ZHOU Luke | D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
9 | YOO Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
10 | LIU Yihong | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
11 | PARK Ethan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
12 | TIAN Dylan | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
13 | LI Vance | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
14 | BUTLER Xavier | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | FAYEZ Adam | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
16 | NGUYEN Norris | D V V D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
17 | ZHANG Jenson | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | MAZAHERI John | V V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
19 | WANG Mason | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
20 | YU Rex | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
21 | KHALID Ilyas | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
22 | YOU Asher | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
23 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | D D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
24 | SHIM Jaeyoo | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
25 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | HOLDEN Harrison | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
27 | PAGLIARINI James | D V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
28 | REN Mark | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
28 | MODI Vihaan | D V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
30 | NG Remy | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
31 | MAXWELL Taiga | D D V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
32 | YAN Milan | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
33 | GUJJA Rishabh | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
34 | DESAI Jairaj | V D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
35 | LEUNG Joon | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
36 | SI Alexander | V V V D V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
37 | TALANDZEVICIUS Tomas | D V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
38 | GAO Guanyi (Jonathan) | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | ZHAO Ryan | D V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
39 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
41 | WANG William | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
42 | FU Benjamin | V V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
43 | KETCHAM Conrad | D V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
44 | LIU YULIN | V V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
45 | THOMSON Piers | D V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
45 | WANG carson | D V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
47 | QU ethan | D D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
48 | CHEN Benjamin | V D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
49 | CHAUDHARY Oliver | V V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
50 | YANG Rony | D V V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
51 | SATHYAN Dhruv | V D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
52 | YI Alexander | D V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
53 | YOU Emmanuel | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
54 | YAO Irvine | V D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
55 | WANG Henry | V D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
56 | CHU Clayton | D D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | TANG Jayce | V V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
57 | LI Kingston | D D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
59 | LI Nolan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
60 | SHABBIR Mohammad Amaan | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | ROULLARD Atticus | D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
62 | FERNANDEZ Chenxing | V D D D D D | V D | 4.5 | 1 | -3.5 |
63 | LEE Eric | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
64 | TRIVULCE Ethan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
65 | MATUSOW Brandon | V V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
66 | LI Jacob | D V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
67 | IVANOV Andrew | V D D V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
68 | ZHOU Silvan | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
69 | LU Jayden | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
70 | REED Andrew | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
71 | KOKLIAGUINE Stefan | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
72 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | D D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
73 | CHI Zachary | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
74 | DUCHNOWSKI Kempson | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
75 | FLINT Liam | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
76 | OLELE Chibuikem | V D D D D D | D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
77 | CHEN Regis | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
78 | AHMAD Aydin | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
79 | WANG Franklin | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
80 | YANG Mikey | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
81 | XIONG Alec | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
82 | ZHANG Jacob | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
83 | LI Nathan Zeting | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | WANG Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | BAIK Jinu | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
86 | FRENCH Luke | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
87 | LEE Samuel | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
88 | LAW Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
89 | MOHANKUMAR Aaditya | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.