MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 2 | KIM Brian | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
| 3 | TANG August L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 5 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 6 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 7 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 8 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
| 9 | RAJ Jay | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 53% | 10% |
| 10 | LU Alex | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% |
| 11 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 12 | LEE Ian | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | RIFKIND Mark | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | FANG Haoyu | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | LIU Yinhong | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 16 | HEYBOER Jason | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | KUE Temujin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 18 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 19 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | TEH Tang-Ngu | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | EDWARDS Maxon | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 40% | 12% | |
| 23 | MASSIMINO Andrew | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 24 | DAVIS Benjamin | 20% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | SEIGEL Duncan | - | 2% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | FINDLER Zachary | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | POWELL Sean | - | 10% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | STRINGER David | - | - | 4% | 28% | 46% | 21% | |
| 29 | CLARK Benjamin | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 30 | REAUME Nate | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | EDWARDS Connor | - | 3% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | YATES Graeme | 17% | 70% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | TAM Kyle | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | BARRETT Austin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 35 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | CROOM Tucker | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | CHAN William | 70% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | NEWMAN Noah | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BERSCHEID Arthur | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 41 | COPELAND Nigel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 42 | HERRERA Xavier | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZMUDA Aiden | 16% | 43% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 44 | IRVINE Brody | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 45 | TOEWS Jackson | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 46 | GRINER Kevin | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | WENGER Liam | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | TOWNE Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 49 | KAGAN Noah | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NI Aaric | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 17% | 56% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOGOI Kavi | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MAVANI Krishna | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 54 | FRASER Alistair | 65% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | RUBY Asher | 26% | 47% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | DRAWZ Chase | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ZINSER Jamie | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 12% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | CHASE Crosby | 40% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | TERPSTRA Clive | 78% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.