MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 2 | KIM Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 31% | |
| 3 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 5 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 6 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 7 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 8 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 7% |
| 9 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 10% |
| 10 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% |
| 11 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 12 | LEE Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | RIFKIND Mark | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 14 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 15 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 16 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 18 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% | |
| 19 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 12% | |
| 23 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 24 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 80% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 26 | FINDLER Zachary | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 100% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 21% | |
| 29 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 30 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 32 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 83% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 35 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | CROOM Tucker | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 37 | CHAN William | 100% | 30% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | NEWMAN Noah | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BERSCHEID Arthur | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 41 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 42 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 84% | 41% | 7% | - | - | |
| 44 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 45 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 46 | GRINER Kevin | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 49 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NI Aaric | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 83% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 75% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 54 | FRASER Alistair | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | RUBY Asher | 100% | 74% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ZINSER Jamie | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | TERPSTRA Clive | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.