San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LAO Scott E. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | DARIANO Noah G. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | HUANG Bernard | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 5 | LAI Christopher W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | XIAO EDWARD | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | DIERKS Kian | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 9 | LIN Dashiell | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | NG Eben S. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | BANERJEE Anup | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 12 | LO Conrad | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 13 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 14 | CHUANG Kian J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 15 | WHITE Austin M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 17 | BAO Aaron | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | YEE Johnathan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | HUANG Kevin D. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | BAEK David | V D V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 21 | DETERING Julian | D V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | CHEN Bryce | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | MU Jeffrey | V V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | STIAGUN Nikita | D D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | LIM Charles Q. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | HOU Kenneth | V D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 29 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | V V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | V D V D D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 32 | TEH Ryan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | SHEN Owen | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 34 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 34 | ZENG Chuyi | V V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 36 | WANG Ethan | D V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 37 | TAPUS Andrei | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 38 | CRACRAFT John R. | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 39 | BELANGER Jackson | V D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 39 | TANG Adrian | D D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | ZHANG Jiening G. | D D V D V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 42 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 43 | CHIN Ryan | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | AMAYA Jared C. | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 44 | WONG Louis | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 46 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | TAPUS Alexandru | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | ZUO Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 49 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | D D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
| 50 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 51 | FU Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 52 | COTHRAN Jack | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 52 | VALOUEV Aleksey | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | GERA Kaveer | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.