San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
2 | LAO Scott E. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
3 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
3 | HUANG Bernard | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
5 | LAI Christopher W. | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 24% |
6 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
7 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
9 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
10 | NG Eben S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
11 | BANERJEE Anup | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
12 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% |
13 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 23% |
14 | CHUANG Kian J. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
15 | WHITE Austin M. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
17 | BAO Aaron | - | - | 6% | 32% | 44% | 15% | 1% |
18 | YEE Johnathan | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 33% | 7% | - |
19 | HUANG Kevin D. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
20 | BAEK David | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
21 | DETERING Julian | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
22 | CHEN Bryce | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
23 | WU Conrad J. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
24 | MU Jeffrey | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
26 | STIAGUN Nikita | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
27 | LIM Charles Q. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
28 | HOU Kenneth | - | 5% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
29 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
31 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
32 | TEH Ryan | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | SHEN Owen | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
34 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | ZENG Chuyi | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | WANG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
37 | TAPUS Andrei | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
38 | CRACRAFT John R. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
39 | BELANGER Jackson | 5% | 30% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
39 | TANG Adrian | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
41 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
42 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
43 | CHIN Ryan | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | AMAYA Jared C. | 46% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | WONG Louis | 18% | 48% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | TAPUS Alexandru | 37% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
48 | ZUO Ethan | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
49 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | < 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
50 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
51 | FU Vincent | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | COTHRAN Jack | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | GERA Kaveer | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.