Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
2 | HU Sophie | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% | |
3 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
3 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
5 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 45% | 9% | |
6 | YIN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
7 | ZHU Ella | - | - | 1% | 15% | 49% | 34% | |
8 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
9 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 13% |
10 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
11 | PARK Hannah | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
12 | YANG Olivia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 34% | |
13 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
14 | KHETPAL Aalia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
15 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
16 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
17 | LI Christina | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | |
18 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
19 | ZHU Alivia | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
20 | LIU Bella | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | SMOLICH Emily | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
22 | VO Evelyn | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | FAROOQI Eliora | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
24 | ZHU Audrey | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
25 | KIM Audrey | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 19% | 2% | |
26 | PAEK Mila | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
27 | BREWER Gracie | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
28 | HUANG Emma | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
29 | FENG Claire | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
30 | WANG Joann | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
32 | LU Miaotian | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
33 | TANG Clementine | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
34 | WANG Allyson | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
35 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | KIM Lael | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
37 | REILLY Carys | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
38 | LI Katelyn | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
39 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
40 | LALONDE Beatrice | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | CAPPIELLO Francesca | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | PAEK Ellie | 8% | 38% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
43 | WEST Mira | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | JU Victoria | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
45 | IRIZARRY Nyla | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
46 | SUN Erin | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
47 | DEVISETTY Anjali | 17% | 43% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
48 | WANG Christina | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
49 | MA Laurie | 34% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | HUANG Jiayu | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
51 | ZELDIN Nina | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
52 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
53 | CLOUD Chrystie | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
54 | JOSEPH Hannah | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
55 | TAYLOR Tess | 22% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
56 | YAO Emma | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
57 | ZHU Alicia | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
58 | LI Beatrice | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | PAK Sophie | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | LU Sophie | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.