Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 2 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 15% |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 3 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 5 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | 6% |
| 6 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 7 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 8 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 9 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 11 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% |
| 12 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 13 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 15 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 16 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 17 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
| 18 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 20 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 22 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 23 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 24 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
| 26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 28 | CHO Lorin Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 31 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 33 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 34 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
| 35 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 36 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WILSON Anna S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 38 | SHEN Sophia | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 41 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 42 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 43 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 44 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 45 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
| 46 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 47 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 48 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 49 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 10% |
| 50 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 51 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KONDAMANI Anya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 54 | LIN Emma | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | NAGER Abigail | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 59 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 61 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | WU Celine | 100% | 73% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 91% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | SU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | SHEN Annabel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 68 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 69 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 70 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 72 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | FU Qihan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 93% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | NORTH Zoe M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 77 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 78 | CHO Claire E. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | ROY Layla | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | HU Felice | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 93% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 82 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | SUNG Yoomin | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 85 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | MAHNKEN Rachel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | QIAN Jade | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | ZHOU Dorothy S. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | JHAVERI Sanjana | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | JIN Wendy | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.