Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
2 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
3 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
3 | LU Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
5 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
6 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 30% |
6 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
8 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
9 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
10 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
11 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% |
12 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 22% | |
13 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
14 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
15 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 11% |
16 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
17 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
18 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 20% | 1% |
19 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
20 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
21 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
22 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
23 | JIN Xinyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
24 | YOON Byungheon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 5% |
25 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
26 | TARCHICHI Robby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 6% |
27 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
28 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
29 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
30 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% | |
31 | CHIANG Aiden | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
32 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
33 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 2% |
34 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 7% |
35 | JIANG Bohan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
37 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
38 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
39 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
40 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 1% |
41 | XU Ryan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
42 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - |
44 | DANTON Ryan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
45 | JIN George | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
46 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
47 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
48 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
49 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
50 | SHAW Eric | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
52 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | WEBER Andrew | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
54 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
56 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
57 | BOWLES Kevin | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
58 | STANSBURY Desmond | 100% | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
59 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | 4% |
59 | HE Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | - |
59 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
62 | CHOW Kingsley | 100% | 86% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
63 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
64 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
65 | PARMAR Veer | 100% | 96% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
66 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
67 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
68 | LI Andrew | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
69 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
70 | HUANG Anthony | 100% | 89% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
71 | MACK Ethan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
72 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - |
73 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
74 | NEGLEY Royce | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | JORGE Elijah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
76 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
77 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
78 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
80 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
81 | TUCKER Nechiga | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
82 | RAMESH Prashvin | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
83 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
84 | PACK Lindsey | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
85 | BABER Shaheer | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
86 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | LIN Oliver | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
88 | XIANG Wangzhi | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
89 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 81% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
90 | KAZAKEVICH Kanstantsin | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
91 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
92 | HOARE Gabriel | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
93 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
93 | CHEN Timothy | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
95 | LEUNG Ezra | 100% | 97% | 65% | 22% | 2% | - | |
96 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.