Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | WONG Adrian | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | MARX Jackson L. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
3 | XU Jia Bao | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
5 | LIU Derek | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
6 | TANG Alexander L. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
8 | GUO Justin | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
9 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
10 | YANG Luao | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
11 | TANG Albert | V V V V V | V V D | 1.7 | 5 | +3.3 |
12 | TANG August L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
13 | LIN James G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
14 | LIN Michael | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
15 | AROUH Dylan | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
16 | ZHEN Ethan | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
17 | XU Andy P. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | CHENG Ethan | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
19 | XU Ethan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | LIEW Jeremy K. | D V V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
21 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
22 | XIE Brandon | V D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | XIAO Benjamin | V V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | DONG Quintin | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
26 | YU Jason | V D D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
27 | CHEN Kyle P. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | TANG Owen S. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
29 | MATSAKH Philip | V D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
30 | LI Aaron | D V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
31 | SHIM Peter S. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
32 | SHAO Eric | D V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
33 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | WONG Jacob W. | V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
35 | FUKUDA Diego | V D V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
36 | LI Matthew | V D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | LEE Jonah | D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
38 | BOBROW Silas | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
39 | GERRISH William | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
40 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | LEE Brendan | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
43 | YAO Bradley | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
45 | SENIC Lucas | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
46 | SIMON Luke | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
47 | HAN Jinu | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
48 | MALHAM Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
49 | HONG Logan | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
50 | JURMAN Therin | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
51 | ZHENG Leon | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
52 | TAN Aidan | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
53 | WONG Jackson | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
54 | SALDANHA Rafael | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
55 | NG Micah | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
56 | RAYKIN Gabriel | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
57 | BOSCO-SCHMIDT Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
58 | GOFMAN Robert | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
59 | HUANG Eythan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
60 | TANG Terry | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.