Twin Cities Fencing Club - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 2 | WILKINS Mateo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | MARTIN Wesley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 3 | GLOVER George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% | |
| 5 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 12% | |
| 6 | ZINSER Jamie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 18% | |
| 7 | LI Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 8 | JARCHO Beckett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | |
| 9 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 10 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 11 | MENASCO Juliun | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 12 | HOPKINS Dylan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 13 | NARANJO David E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 14 | TRAN Allex | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 15 | RIES Celina | 100% | 92% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | HICKNER Gabe | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 19 | HELLMAN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 20 | EDLIN Miranda | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | ARTHURS Minna | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 100% | 88% | 45% | 6% | - | - | |
| 23 | BUECKING Jannis | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 24 | MOULDER Dylan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | DAVIS Jace W. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | NEPAL Noukou Asha | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | MOHAMED Ahmed | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | PETERSON Penelope | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | CHRISTENSEN Jack | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | GUIDER Lee | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | ROY Griffin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | FENNEWALD Adam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | KIM Hokyum | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 35 | ODETTE Jack | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 36 | HELLMAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 37 | CANADA Ethan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.