Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | LU Royce | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
| 3 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 3 | BIELER Mason | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 5 | LE Jacob H. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 6 | SALEH Omar | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 41% | 6% |
| 7 | BAE Eugene | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 15% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 9 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 50% | 12% |
| 10 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | < 1% |
| 11 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
| 12 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% |
| 13 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 14 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 15 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | CHAN Joseph | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | PARK William | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 18 | WANDJI Noah | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 19 | ZHOU Ryan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 11% |
| 20 | WONG Braxton | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% |
| 23 | LI Lucas | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 24 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 51% | 15% |
| 25 | BI Ryan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | CHONG Tristan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | CAJERO Luis O. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 28 | SEIGEL Duncan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DOUGLASS Liam | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | PETROV Mikhail | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | LEE Abin | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 33 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 34 | TSOI Spencer | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 34 | JACOB Ezra | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CHEN Fengyi(James) | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 37 | MIRON Ioachim | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | 1% | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | WANG sicheng | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | TSAY Jordan R. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LEE Mason | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Raphael | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | KARPMAN Benny | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | CHEN kenneth | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 1% |
| 46 | QU Richard | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | PE Noah | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | YU Eric | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | GUO Joey | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 51 | YOUNG Luke | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | YUNG Brandon | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Andrew | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WEI Winston | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Jayden | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | DACKO Nolan | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 59 | FOY Grant | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 60 | PETRAITIS Matteus | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 62 | PEAKE Santiago | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | BLUNCK Kristof | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 64 | WASHBURN Cooper | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 65 | FU Owen | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 66 | CHANG Jeremy | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 15% | 49% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 69 | WANG Ancen | 2% | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
| 70 | TURNER Finian | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 71 | YE Jerry | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | LEE Christopher | 21% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 73 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | MARSHALL Kyler | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.