Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WHITE Ryden | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 2 | YAO Tristan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 3 | RONG Marcus | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | DU Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 5 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 6 | KIM Daniel | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 7 | ENG Kyler | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 8 | HUA Nolan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | SHOURIE Neel | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | KIM Evan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | WANG Lucas | - | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 12 | FU Nolan | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 13 | YU Brandon | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 14 | LEE Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 15 | HWANG Matthew | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 16 | MYRAH Devin | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 17 | PARKE Nathaniel | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 18 | LU Ian | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 19 | TANG Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 20 | KROTZ Nicolas | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | MOSLEY Wally | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 22 | LI Stephen | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | LEE Leo | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 24 | WU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 25 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 26 | MA Nolan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 27 | WONG Aaron | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 28 | SCHIPPER Johann | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 29 | PARRA Lucas | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | LIU Aiden | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | XUE Michael | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
| 32 | WANG Suian (Andy) | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 34 | DING Max | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | LI Vance | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | ZENG Oliver | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 37 | LIU Daniel | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | ROBERTS Arthur | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 39 | LIN Daniel | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | LAU Caleb | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Aiden | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 42 | ZHANG Zhihan | 2% | 11% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | LO Stefan | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | REN Mark | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 46 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | YI Alexander | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 48 | CHEN Christopher | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 49 | JU Shang | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 50 | TIAN Dylan | 1% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | KIM Leejay | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 52 | WANG Ryan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | CHAN Joseph | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | LIN Bryan | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 55 | GUO Jonathan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 56 | ZHANG Jenson | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 57 | YOON Ian | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 58 | WONG Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 59 | FONG Ethan | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | NOLAN Morgan | 15% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | TAVERNA Matteo | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 62 | SHOURIE Seth | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 63 | WONG Kyle | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | YOO Lucas | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 65 | YU Haoyun | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 66 | WANG Juehan | - | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 67 | LEUNG Joon | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 68 | GUO Zihe | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | MAZAHERI Theodore | - | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 70 | LIN Logan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 71 | CHU Clayton | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 72 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 72 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | CHEN Anderson | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KONG William | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 76 | ABD ALLAH Hamza | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 77 | YUN Nicholas | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | KOU Logan | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | HUNG Ludwig | 23% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LI Jacob | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | HUYNH Ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 83 | BUSH Andrew | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | SI Alexander | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | ZHAO Luke | 2% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 86 | WON Jacob | 22% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 87 | HANCOCK Bryce | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 88 | PARK Sean | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 89 | YU Rex | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 90 | YUN Mason | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 91 | LIU William | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | LI Nathan | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | PURCELL Jonathan | - | < 1% | 9% | 52% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 94 | TENG Eric | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 95 | KONG Dean | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 96 | WANG Hansen | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 97 | GAN Samuel | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | ZHANG William | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 99 | LEE Connor | 39% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 100 | LI Ethan | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 101 | LEE Zeo | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 102 | YANG Rony | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 104 | EVANS Harvey | 1% | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 105 | MA Murphy | 39% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 106 | KIM Benjamin | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 107 | KIM Christian | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 108 | LAU Jesse | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | CARDON Hinckley | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 110 | JI Dylan | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.