Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
2 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 17% |
3 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
3 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
5 | ZHANG Chaoyi(Joey) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
6 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
7 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
8 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 7% |
9 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
10 | KIM Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
11 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
12 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
13 | YU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
14 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
15 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
16 | MYRAH Devin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
17 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
18 | LU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
19 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
20 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
21 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
22 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
23 | LEE Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
24 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
25 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
26 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
27 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
28 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
29 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
30 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
31 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
32 | WANG Suian (Andy) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
33 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
34 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
35 | LI Vance | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
36 | ZENG Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
37 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
38 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
39 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
40 | LAU Caleb | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
41 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
42 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
42 | ZHANG Zhihan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
44 | LO Stefan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
45 | REN Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
46 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
47 | YI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
48 | CHEN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
49 | JU Shang | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
50 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
51 | KIM Leejay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
52 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
53 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
54 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
55 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
56 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
57 | YOON Ian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
58 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
59 | FONG Ethan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | NOLAN Morgan | 100% | 85% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
61 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
62 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
63 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
64 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
65 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
66 | WANG Juehan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
67 | LEUNG Joon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
68 | GUO Zihe | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
69 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
70 | LIN Logan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
71 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
72 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
72 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
72 | CHEN Anderson | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
75 | KONG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
76 | ABD ALLAH Hamza | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
77 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 81% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
78 | KOU Logan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
78 | HUNG Ludwig | 100% | 77% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
80 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | LI Jacob | 100% | 91% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
82 | HUYNH Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
83 | BUSH Andrew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
84 | SI Alexander | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
85 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | |
86 | WON Jacob | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
87 | HANCOCK Bryce | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
88 | PARK Sean | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
89 | YU Rex | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
90 | YUN Mason | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
91 | LIU William | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
92 | LI Nathan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
93 | PURCELL Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 38% | 6% | - |
94 | TENG Eric | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
95 | KONG Dean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
96 | WANG Hansen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
97 | GAN Samuel | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
98 | ZHANG William | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
99 | LEE Connor | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
100 | LI Ethan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
101 | LEE Zeo | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
102 | YANG Rony | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
103 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 78% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
104 | EVANS Harvey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
105 | MA Murphy | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
106 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
107 | KIM Christian | 100% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
108 | LAU Jesse | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
108 | CARDON Hinckley | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
110 | JI Dylan | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.