Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Saeren | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
| 2 | CHEN Cindy | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% | |
| 3 | BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | LIU Isabel | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | PARK Chloe | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 6 | CHANG Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 7 | SARATH Sana | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 8 | CORD Sophia | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 9 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 9 | CAO Kim | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 11 | VIGNEUX Nolwenn | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 13 | CHENG Anna | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 14 | KO Ariel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 15 | BAEK Aileen | 1% | 17% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | CAI Joanna | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 17 | DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 18 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 19 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 20 | NGUYEN Summer | - | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 23% | |
| 21 | SHI Maxine | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | LIN Rachel | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 23 | WANG Makayla | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | LONG Chloe | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
| 25 | SONG Phoebe | 3% | 18% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | CHANG Kylie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 27 | ZOFFEL Gabriela | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 28 | YANG Renee | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HU Ashley | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
| 30 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | OLESKY Ellie | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 32 | TABANCAY Ava | - | 3% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 3% | |
| 33 | SCHAMBERGER Amelia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | DUDNICK Caitlin | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | GUO YUKI | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | LI Cici | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | BRIMMER Bella | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 38 | WOO Ava | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 39 | DENG Oscar | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | JOHNSTON Sabrina | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | WANG Sinuo | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 42 | SUN Candics | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
| 43 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 44 | ZHONG Alexandra | 19% | 52% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | LIU Jessica | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 46 | FANG Lauren | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LIU Kaylee | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | ARVIND Heera | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | LIU Anya | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | SEELMAN Alexa | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | LUC Madisyn | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | FAN Tina | - | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 10% |
| 53 | ZHOU Kelsey | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | TAN Angela | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | ROBBINS Lydia | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | ASHIKHMINA Agniya | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 57 | ZHAO Audrey | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHONG Victoria | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WONG Chloe | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | VAN ROY Petra | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | SU Stacy | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | HAN yujie | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | LIU Celia | 1% | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.