South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 2 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 3 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 5 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 7 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | SPRINGER Patrick | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 10 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 12 | GU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 14 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 18 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% | |
| 19 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 20 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | TANG Charles | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 23 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 27 | LIN Stephen | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | SHI Erick | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 34 | GAJDA Jesse | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHANG Yuyang | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WRUBEL Natan G. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 38 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | SEN David | 100% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | PILAT Matthew J. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.